Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown Point
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.
The appellant sought to enjoin the appellees from constructing a pavement upon certain ground claimed by the appellant to belong ex*538clusively to it, and as forming a part of its depot and station grounds at Crown Point.
The case was tried by the court and resulted in a special finding of facts, with conclusions of law stated and excepted to, and a judgment in favor of the appellees. There is no question but that the fee in the way in dispute is in the appellant, but the points of contention are as to whether' the way became a public street by user or by dedication, and whether the proceedings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Cole v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.