Legal Opinion

Element Materials Technology Food US LLC v. Kahl

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 25, 2024No. 3:19-cv-01491Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ELEMENT MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY Case No. 3:19-cv-1491-SI FOOD US LLC and EXOVA, INC., OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, v. NIDAL KAHL and BIOGEN LABORATORY DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, Defendants. Kathryn G. Mantoan, ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP, 1120 NW Couch Street, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97209; Andrew Livingston, ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP, 405 Howard Street, The Orrick Building, San Francisco, CA 94105; and Frank N. Zalom, ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP, 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000, Sacramento, CA 95814. Of Attorneys for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re the Exxon Valdez, Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Shipping Company, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mutuelles Unies v. Kroll & LinstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API