Legal Opinion

Miley v. Harmony Mill Ltd. Partnership

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 24, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-592-JLLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Harmony Mill Limited Partnership, seeks an order for summary judgment against plaintiffs David C. Miley, Sr. and April P. Miley, his wife, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for alleged injuries sustained when Mr. Miley fell in the shower in an apartment owned by defendant. Plaintiffs base their claim on five separate theories of liability: (1) common-law negligence, (2) strict liability in tort, (3) breach of warranties for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cline v. Prowler Industries of MaryLand, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hospital for ChildrenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Miley v. Harmony Mill Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  5. Boulden v. Colonial Garden Apartments, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API