Legal Opinion

Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2013No. 12-1719PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Bristol Care, Inc., (“Bristol Care”) appeals the denial of its motion to compel arbitration in a suit initiated by its former employee Sharon Owen asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and seeking class action certification on behalf of other similarly situated current and former employees. Bristol Care contends that the district court incorrectly held that the Mandatory Arbitration Agreement (“MAA”) signed by Owen and Bristol Care was invalid because it contained a class action waiver provision that prohibits Owen from arbitrating claims subject…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Compucredit Corp. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Ashley Walthour v. Chipio Windshield Repair, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API