Legal Opinion
Klatte v. Franklin State Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :
Fowler, J.
There is no dispute that the bond in suit originally bound all the parties to it to payment of the checks drawn by Mr. Klatte against his deposits. The issues may best be treated by taking up successively the points relied on by the defendant sureties to relieve them of this obligation.(1) Mr. W. B. Rubin contends, and the circuit court ruled in his favor, that his notice of withdrawal effected his dis*618charge. That his notice had such effect is ruled by Bremer v. Rufener, 186 Wis. 195, 202 N. W. 206. The agreement there involved was in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Jordan v. DobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Gay v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- City of Madison v. American Sanitary Engineering Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- First Wisconsin Financial Corporation v. Thomas YamaguchiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Haynie v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- McFarland State Bank v. SherryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.