Wellman v. Noble
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a judgment granting a new trial as to damages, unless both sides agreed to an addition of $3,000 to a general damage jury award of $2,000 and special damages of $2,500.1 Defendants withheld consent.
Two questions require consideration: 1) Was the court’s refusal to instruct on “unavoidable accident” prejudicial error? 2) Did the court abuse its discretion in granting a new trial? We consider these questions in the order stated.
1) The failure to instruct on “unavoidable accident” was not prejudicial error.
In the rolling knoll country of Nebraska, a truck towing a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
- Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Saltas v. AffleckUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Uptown Appliance & Radio Co., Inc. v. FLINTUtah Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Goddard v. HickmanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Robinson v. HreinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Woodhouse Ex Rel. Woodhouse v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.