Legal Opinion

Wellman v. Noble

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1961No. 9392PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment granting a new trial as to damages, unless both sides agreed to an addition of $3,000 to a general damage jury award of $2,000 and special damages of $2,500.1 Defendants withheld consent.

Two questions require consideration: 1) Was the court’s refusal to instruct on “unavoidable accident” prejudicial error? 2) Did the court abuse its discretion in granting a new trial? We consider these questions in the order stated.

1) The failure to instruct on “unavoidable accident” was not prejudicial error.

In the rolling knoll country of Nebraska, a truck towing a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Saltas v. AffleckUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Uptown Appliance & Radio Co., Inc. v. FLINTUtah Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Goddard v. HickmanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Robinson v. HreinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Woodhouse Ex Rel. Woodhouse v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API