Legal Opinion

Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1940No. 27670PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The Toledo Trust Company, defendant herein, relies upon the defense of res judicata which was properly pleaded. If this court holds that this defense was made out as a matter of law under the pleadings and evidence, it is not necessary to inquire into the other assignments of error.

This defense is based upon the adjudication in the case of Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co., 132 Ohio St., 21, 4 N. E. (2d), 917.

In that case the amended exceptions to the inventory raised the question whether the personal property (identical with that now in litigation) was lawfully included as assets in the inventory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Clark v. BaranowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dipaolo v. DevictorOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Ramsey v. Chesapeake & OR Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
  4. Cole v. Ottawa Home & Savings Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re Estate of RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API