Cole v. Ottawa Home & Savings Ass'n
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The important issues raised by these two cases are identical, viz.:
1. Who are to be considered as proper parties to a hearing upon exceptions to an inventory filed pursuant to Section 2115.16, Revised Code?
2. Is the summary procedure provided for under Section 2115.16, Revised Code, a proper proceeding in which title to assets may be determined, and, if it is, is that determination subject to attack in a subsequent action by a person not a party to the original hearing in Probate Court?
Section 2101.24(C), Revised Code, grants jurisdiction to the Probate Court “to direct and control the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Quinn v. State Ex Rel. LeroyOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of HatchOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Streeper, Admr. v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dipaolo v. DevictorOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sheets v. AntesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- South Ridge Baptist Church v. Industrial CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.