Legal Opinion

Cole v. Ottawa Home & Savings Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1969No. Nos. 68-230 and 68-292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The important issues raised by these two cases are identical, viz.:

1. Who are to be considered as proper parties to a hearing upon exceptions to an inventory filed pursuant to Section 2115.16, Revised Code?

2. Is the summary procedure provided for under Section 2115.16, Revised Code, a proper proceeding in which title to assets may be determined, and, if it is, is that determination subject to attack in a subsequent action by a person not a party to the original hearing in Probate Court?

Section 2101.24(C), Revised Code, grants jurisdiction to the Probate Court “to direct and control the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Quinn v. State Ex Rel. LeroyOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of HatchOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Streeper, Admr. v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Dipaolo v. DevictorOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Sheets v. AntesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. South Ridge Baptist Church v. Industrial CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API