Clark v. Baranowski
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
The municipal court had unquestioned jurisdiction to enter the personal judgment and order of foreclosure. It also had jurisdiction over the cross-petition, which sought to have the notes and mortgage declared invalid and canceled. On the other hand, the common pleas court had jurisdiction over the action in replevin to determine the possession and right of possession of the personal property described in the mortgage, and it also had jurisdiction over the issues raised by the cross-petition, and had a right to enter the decree finding the notes and mortgage void, and entering judgment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Howard v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Seymour v. HubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3Cited by14 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Young v. MorrowOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Ambatielos v. Foundation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.