Legal Opinion

State v. Grewell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-1258PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

Three issues are presented for review. The primary issue is whether grand' jury proceedings must be recorded. Secondary issues are whether the failure to record grand jury proceedings prejudiced the defendant Grewell, and whether the defendant’s motion for acquittal should have been granted. For the following reasons we find that grand jury proceedings must be recorded and we affirm the defendant’s convictions.

I

The advantages of requiring the recording of grand jury proceedings have been recognized. In 1979 the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were amended to require the recording of grand…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. Charles Estepa and Francis VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. WicklineOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HennessOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API