State v. Lawson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
Appellant has raised twelve propositions of law. Each has been thoroughly reviewed and for the reasons stated below we find them without merit, and uphold the appellant’s convictions and death sentence.
I
Appellant’s second, third and fourth propositions of law are interrelated. They stem from the admission into evidence of a tape-recorded conversation between appellant and Billy Payton. The portion played to the jury contained the following passage:
“Lawson: Number one is this, * * * he fucked you around, your sister around, the kids around, a lot of people around him he fucked, my little *340brothe…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.