State v. Richey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
We have reviewed appellant’s twenty-three propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentence, balanced *357the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.
I
Evidence of Threats
In his first proposition of law, Richey argues that admitting evidence of his threats destroyed the constitutionally required reliability and fairness of his trial and sentence. This evidence included the following. Richey told Deputy Roy Sargent on…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by233 opinions
- Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.