Legal Opinion

United States v. Fnu Lnu

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 9, 2011No. Docket 10-419-crPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge:

The district court (Weinstein, J.) denied the defendant’s motion to suppress testimony from the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officer who questioned her without Miranda warnings on her arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport. We reject the district court’s reasoning that either a general exception to Miranda for border questioning exists or that the officer’s intent in posing the questions is relevant. But, based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the defendant was not in custody during the questioning and so Miranda warnings were…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. FauxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. SaboonchiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  4. United States v. PorteousCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. JacobsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API