Legal Opinion
United States v. Saboonchi
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 7, 2014No. Criminal Case No. PWG-13-100PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
Defendant Ali Saboonchi is alleged to have violated U.S. export restrictions on trade with the Islamic Republic of Iran. On July 18, 2013, Saboonchi moved to suppress the fruits of warrantless forensic searches of his smartphones and flash drive performed under the authority of the border search doctrine after they were seized at the U.S. — Canadian border. At a hearing on September 23, 2013, I issued an oral opinion denying the motion but stated that, in light of the difficult issues raised by a forensic search of digital devices seized at the…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Hamza KolsuzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Karl TousetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Maria Molina-IsidoroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jae Shik KimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.