Elizabeth Clemons v. Norton Healthcare Inc. Retirement Plan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is the latest installment in an ERISA litigation saga that has spanned almost ten years. At the risk of oversimplifying their case, the Plaintiff-Retirees claim that Defendant Norton Healthcare, Inc. Retirement Plan ("Norton") underpaid them under the terms of the plan. The district court found that the plan was unambiguous in the Retirees' favor. We agree with the district court on most issues. However, because the Plan is ambiguous *259 in one crucial respect and may not comply with ERISA in another, we VACATE the district court's summary judgment order and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Cheryl Wallace v. Oakwood Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Richard Davis v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Judy Fulkerson v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Pund v. City of BedfordDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.