Legal Opinion
Pund v. City of Bedford
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 10, 2018No. Case No. 1:16CV1076PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the First, Second, Fourth, Ninth, and Thirteenth Prayers for Relief in their First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 45. Defendants responded in opposition. ECF No. 46. Plaintiffs filed a reply. ECF No. 47. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Additionally, *707the Court certifies Plaintiffs' proposed class under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 23(b)(3) and directs Class Counsel to promptly file a Proposed Notice of Pendency of Class Action under Rule…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Omaha Property Owners Association, Inc. v. The City of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Pleasant View Baptist Church v. SaddlerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Yannotti v. Ann ArborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019