Legal Opinion

Sipriano v. Great Spring Waters of America, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1999No. 98-0247PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

For over ninety years, this Court has adhered to the common-law rule of capture in allocating the respective rights and liabilities of neighboring landowners for use of groundwater flowing beneath their property. The rule of capture essentially allows, with some limited exceptions, a landowner to pump as much groundwater as the landowner chooses, without liability to neighbors who claim that the pumping has depleted their wells. We are asked today whether Texas should abandon this rule for the rule of reasonable use, which would limit the common-law right of a surface owner to take water from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. EastTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. David Stratta v. Billy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. The Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. Burrell Day and Joel McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API