Legal Opinion

Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC v. City of Lubbock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2016No. 14-0572PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hecht

JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE JOHNSON, JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined.

Absent an agreement to the contrary, an oil-and-gas lessee has an implied right to use the land as reasonably necessary to produce and remove the minerals but must exercise that right with due regard for the laiidowner’s rights.1 This rule has come to be called the accommodation doctrine. The issue now before us is whether the doctrine also applies as between a landowner and the owner of an interest in the groundwater. Contrary to the court of appeals,2 we hold that it does, but we agree with that court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lightning Oil Co. v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. David Stratta v. Billy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Melden & Hunt, Inc. v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Keith Redburn v. Charmelle GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks v. Mayor Sylvester Turner and City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API