Legal Opinion
Stebbins v. Balfour
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 1923No. 23,539PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action of replevin for an automobile. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
On July 7, 1922, one Andrews, the owner, gave to the plaintiff a chattel mortgage on his automobile. The mortgage was duly filed. Afterwards Andrews took the automobile to the defendants in Crookston and they made repairs upon it. The last item of work was done on September 15, 1922. On November 27, 1922, the plaintiff, his chattel mortgage being due and unpaid, demanded possession. The defendants refused to deliver.
The plaintiff was entitled…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Monthly Instalment Loan Co. v. Skellet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Ferriss v. SchreinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Reed v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In re McAllister-Newgord Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sundin v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- New Britain Real Estate & Title Co. v. CollingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- J. I. Case Co. v. JansaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Pratt v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Bongard v. NellenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.