Reed v. Horton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action, in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $204.86 for labor and materials furnished and to foreclose a lien for the same upon a motor vehicle. The case was tried before Olin B. Lewis, J., who made findings as set out in the first paragraph of the opinion. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Between December 3, 1914, and October 11,1915, plaintiff, at various times, furnished material and labor in repairing an automobile in the possession of a conditional vendee. In all some 16 tires were furnished. A number of inner tubes were also furnished and repaired. A lien statement was filed on November 15, 1915, under the provisions of sections 7053-7057, G. S. 1913. The action is to foreclose this lien. The conditional vendors, whose contract was duly filed October 14, 1914, are the respondents. The court found that the different items of appellant’s account "represent separate and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- American Bridge Co. v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fitzpatrick v. ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sundin v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Stebbins v. BalfourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Snyder Automotive Inc. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Crump & Rodgers Co. v. Southern Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958