Bongard v. Nellen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Replevin for an automobile. On a holding that defendant had a possessory lien, he prevailed below. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The facts were settled .by'stipulation. As reflected in. the findings, they are these. Plaintiffs now own the ear as conditional vendors after default of the vendee. From January 24 to August lo, 1939, defendant serviced it “pursuant to an agreement” that he was to “put the automobile in question in a good state of repair.” There is nothing to indicate when, or how, or at what price that desirable objective was to be accomplished.
January 4,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sundin v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Stebbins v. BalfourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Ferriss v. SchreinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- Braufman v. Hart Publication, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951