Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. Heine
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*252OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Appeal is taken from a “no-answer” default judgment. The trial court entered a default judgment against Holt Atherton Industries, Inc., awarding damages of $159,-665.00 to the Heines. By filing a motion for new trial, appellant Holt sought to set aside the judgment. The trial court denied the motion. Holt asserts five points of error. We affirm the judgment.
The Heines sued Holt alleging violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41 — 17.-63 (Vernon 1987)), breach of express and implied warranties, breach of contract,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Norton v. Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- In Re Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
- Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Elder, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
- BMLA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy's Deli v. Keziah Jordan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.