Legal Opinion

In Re Thompson

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 10, 1999No. 09-99-021CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOVER, Justice.

In this mandamus action, the relators are Paula J. Thompson, Mark L. Thompson, and Barry L. Thompson, individually and as heirs and representatives of the estate of Gene Thompson and the estate of Lorna Thompson Camp. They seek to vacate an order signed on January 8, 1999, by the Hon. Donald Floyd of the 172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas. The order finds that an October 1985 judgment against Billy Gene Hinson, Sr. is not a final judgment and sets the case for trial on the trial docket. In addition to asking this Court to vacate the order, relators also ask…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Latty v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alcantar v. Oklahoma National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Billy Gene Hinson, Jr. v. Paula J. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
  3. Billy Gene Hinson, Jr. v. Paula J. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  4. Capital City Security, LLC; Alfonso Valenciano; And Lorena Valenciano v. Pro-Vision Solutions, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
  5. Gwenalyn Westbrook, as Administrator of the Estate of Ernest Westbrook v. Heirs of David Crockett and Marvin Whitehead, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API