Legal Opinion
In re Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG Patent Litig.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 15, 2018No. Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RDM); MDL No. 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the Camera Manufacturers' request for a stay of proceedings. Dkt. 686 at 2. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") has found unpatentable all asserted claims of three of the four patents-in-suit-the '399, '746, and '144 patents (hereinafter "the IPR patents").1 Those decisions are now on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Although the PTO also instituted inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings regarding the asserted claims of the fourth patent-in-suit-the '449 patent -it terminated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. KG v. Fujifilm Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Lenovo Grp. Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Driessen v. Walmart, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. EMC Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Masimo Corporation v. Sotera WirelessDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022