Legal Opinion
Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. KG v. Fujifilm Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 2, 2015No. 2014-1110PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG owns Lf.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399 and 6,895,449. The written descriptions are largely the same, the '449 patent having issued on a divisional application carved out of the application that became the '399 patent. The focus of both patents is an ‘interface device for transferring data between an input/output data device and a host computer. The current appeal involves whether certain digital-camera manufacturers infringe Papst’s patents. The district court, applying and elaborating on its constructions of various claim terms, entered summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Avid Technology, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Shire Development, LLC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- The Medicines Company v. Mylan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.