Legal Opinion
Driessen v. Walmart, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 6, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-3239Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES L. DRIESSEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-cv-3239-EGS-ZMF WALMART INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER This Court now faces the question that The Clash famously asked two decades ago: “Should I stay or should I [say n]o?” The Clash, Combat Rock (1982). On October 28, 2019, pro se Plaintiff James L. Driessen filed this patent infringement suit against Defendants Walmart, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., and Target Corporation (collectively “Defendants”). See ECF No. 1 (Compl.). Plaintiff’s allegations concern claims 1–20 of
U.S. Patent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. Lsi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG Patent Litig.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018