Legal Opinion
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Lenovo Grp. Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 4, 2019No. Civil Action No. 16-10860-PBS; Civil Action No. 16-10868-PBSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge *253INTRODUCTION
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC (collectively, "IV") bring this patent infringement action alleging that Defendant EMC Corporation ("EMC") infringes claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,516,442 (the " '442 patent"). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") invalidated independent claim 1 of the '442 patent as obvious during inter partes review ("IPR"). EMC now moves for summary judgment on the invalidity of dependent claim 11 on two grounds: (1) IV is collaterally estopped from asserting claim 11 or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Rodriguez-Garcia v. Miranda-MarinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION v. COOK GROUP INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Click-to-Call Technologies v. Ingenio, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Inland Diamond Products Co. v. Cherry Optical Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.