Legal Opinion

Lord & McCracken v. Henderson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by Lord & McCracken against S. S. Henderson and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, President:

In an action of assmnpsit, on the common counts and a special count, with bill of particulars, the plaintiffs obtained a verdict and judgment against defendants for eight hundred and seventy-five dollars. In the special count a contract in writing, between plaintiffs and defendants, dated November 7, 1903, was alleged, wherebj1', in consideration of the prices stipulated to be paid them therefor, the plaintiffs contracted with defendants to pile, peel, properly cure and load on ears, according to railroad regulations, all the merchantable bark from green hemlock timber…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delmar Oil Co. v. BartlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tuttle v. MayoNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. LaffertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Trump v. Tidewater Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Thornsbury v. ThornsburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Michaelson v. TurkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wallace v. PrichardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Nunziato Di Felice Fu Vincenzo v. Richwood Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API