Legal Opinion

Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1955No. CC820PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haymond, Judge:

In this action of assumpsit instituted in the Circuit Court of Cabell County on March 30, 1954, the plaintiff, Robert E. Wright, seeks recovery from the defendant, Standard Ultramarine and Color Company, a corporation, in the amount of $38,000.00 for breach by the defendant of a contract between it and the plaintiff who is a former employee of the defendant.

The plaintiff filed and relies upon an amended declaration but he did not file with it any account stating distinctly the several items of his claim, as provided by Section 18, Article 4, Chapter 56, Code, 1931, with respect…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Sheppard v. Peabody Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cook v. Heck's Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shanholtz v. Monongahela Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hatfield v. Health Management Associates of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Williamson v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API