Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1950No. 6080_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corporation (hereinafter called Puett) owned the Harris and Whann patents covering electrical starting gates for horse racing. United Starting Gate Corporation (hereinafter called United) leased a horse racing gate of its own manufacture to the Harford Agricultural and Breeders’ Association (hereinafter ' called Harford) which Harford put into use.
Puett, in the United States District Court of the District of Maryland, instituted a civil action (No. 4084) against Harford, alleging that the United gate used by Harford infringed the Harris and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Harford Agricultural & Breeder's Ass'n v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Mexican Ore Co. v. Mexican Guadalupe Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Dadirrian v. GullianU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897
- Harvey v. BettisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States of America Ex Rel. Shell Oil Company v. Barco Corporation and John BarakatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Donner v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Havens v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Sheets v. City of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.