Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Ertel

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois

Decided December 28, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a suit by George H. Stahl against the Victor Incubator Company and others for infringement of patents, in which injunctions were granted against defendants. Complainant moved for an attachment against George Ertel and A. L. Chase for contempt in violating the injunctions.

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, District Judge.

This suit was brought for the infringement of letters patent No. 267,422, issued to Augustus M. Halstead November 14, 1882, of letters patent No. 258,295, issued May 23, 1882, to Augustus M. Halstead, and of letters patent No. 368,249, issued to complainant, George H. Stahl, August 16, 1887. Other patents wrere declared on, but at the hearing were withdrawn. The bill was filed February 18, 1892, and on motion made for preliminary injunction, on due notice to the defendants in that suit, the cause came up for hearing on April 4,1892, at which hearing, which was had upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Brown v. MetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Craig v. FisherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. My Laundry Co. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Davidson v. MunseyUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Feldman v. American Palestine Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Dadirrian v. GullianU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897
  5. Commercial Investment Co. v. Mayaguez Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API