Legal Opinion
Scanlan v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 12, 2010No. 6:08-cr-06195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Michael Scanlan, (“Scanlan”), a former participant in the Kodak Retirement Income Plan (the “Plan”), brings this action against the Plan and its administrators (collectively “KRIPCO”), seeking, inter alia, to compel defendants to declare a “partial termination” of the Plan and to vest the pension benefits in several hundred plan participants, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and the Plan terms.
The defendants have moved to dismiss the original and amended Complaints (Dkt. # 7, # 14)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SC Note Acquisitions, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Bulovic v. BothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Coon v. WoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Waxman v. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016