Legal Opinion

Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1989No. 87-1829PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of a diversity suit initiated by plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. Marshall (Marshalls) against defendants El Paso Natural Gas Company and Meridian Oil Production, Inc. to recover damages related to the drilling and plugging of an oil and gas well on Marshalls’ real property. For purposes of this appeal we will refer to El Paso Natural Gas Company and Meridian Oil Production, Inc. jointly as Meridian. The jury returned a verdict for Marshalls, awarding $350,050 for diminution in value of the property, $50,000 for nuisance damages, and punitive damages of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Stump v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. McEwen v. City of NormanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API