Legal Opinion
Stump v. Gates
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 1, 2000No. 98-1249, 98-1267PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.
Sara Stump and Andrew M. Ocrant (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action in the district court seeking damages for violation of their federal rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and for civil conspiracy and outrageous conduct under Colorado law. 1
The City of Greenwood Village (“City”) seeks reversal on discrete grounds. 2 The City asserts that the district court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment. We hold that this issue is not reviewable because a final judgment was entered following a jury trial. The City also contends that the district court committed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. And Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, an Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Fogarty v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Mays v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Grynberg Ex Rel. Trust v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Beaudry v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BotefuhrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.