Legal Opinion

In re Rice

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 8, 1999No. 24917Published

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, Keith Andrew Rice (Respondent) is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) contained in Rule 407, SCACR, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Commission) began investigating this matter in March 1997. Respondent, an Aiken attorney, did not reply to two letters the Commission sent him in April 1997; nor did he reply to the notice of full investigation sent to him in January 1998.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Matter of KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API