Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1994No. WD 48449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Judge.

Shaughnessy, Fickel and Scott Architects, Inc. (Architects), and Structural Engineering Associates, Inc. (Engineers), appeal the circuit court’s order dismissing their cross-claims for contractual indemnity against A.L. Huber and Son, Inc. (General Contractor). The issue presented is whether the General Contractor is obligated pursuant to contract to indemnify Engineers and Architects for costs and attorney fees incurred defending against a claim by a masonry worker employed by a subcontractor for personal injury on the job site. Architects and Engineers were awarded summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Davis CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Arnold v. S.J.L. of Kansas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Chetopa State Bancshares, Inc. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott ArchitectsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Butters v. Consolidated Transfer & Warehouse Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Greer v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. East-Harding, Inc. v. Horace A. Piazza & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API