Legal Opinion

Greer v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2002No. 1-3 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

We granted the Petition for Allowance of Appeal of Custom Tower Structures (“CTS”) to consider whether under the contract at issue in this case, the Commonwealth Court’s decision allowing indemnification for damage caused by the indemnitees’ own negligence violates the rule set forth in Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co., 527 Pa. 1, 588 A.2d 1 (1991). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

In 1993, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”) entered into a contract with J.H. Green Electric Company (“Green”) to remove large overhead signs from Interstate 95 in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Lavelle v. KochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Braegelmann v. Horizon Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Hagerman Construction Corp. v. Long Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Widmer Engineering, Inc. v. DufallaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Bernotas v. Super Fresh Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API