Chetopa State Bancshares, Inc. v. Fox
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Woleslagel, J.:
As parts of a contract for the sale of the stock of the Chetopa State Bank, the defendants, as stockholder-sellers, provided two indemnity clauses in favor of the purchaser who assigned his rights to the plaintiff.
The first provision related to claims or debts then existing, “or growing out of this Stock Purchase Agreement.”
The second provision related to expense “at any time after the date hereof, arising from, or as a result or in respect of, the breach of any warranty, representation or covenant made by Sellers” in the agreement.
Two lawsuits and one tax claim, each based on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Vallejos v. C. E. Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- D'Albora v. Tulane UniversityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Burr v. LichtenheimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Douglas v. LombardinoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.