Legal Opinion
United States v. Kanasco, Limited
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1997No. 96-1996PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge WILLIAMS joined.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge.
The United States filed a complaint for forfeiture requesting the seizure and condemnation of approximately 104 drums of adulterated bulk antibiotics manufactured by Kanasco, Limited. After federal marshals seized the drugs, Kanasco filed an answer to the complaint and a claim for the drugs. Kanasco argued that the drugs were not adulterated, and requested their release and return.
Following discovery, the Government moved for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commissioner v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- John C. Honor, Jr. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Esther Bein and William BeinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ceverilo ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Jewel A. Farlow,plaintiff-Appellant v. Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Pena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.