Legal Opinion
Carl Borchsenius Co. v. Gardner
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 15, 1968No. Civ. A. 68-321PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASSIBRY, District Judge:
This is a proceeding in the nature of mandamus in which the plaintiff, Carl Borchsenius Co., Inc., a New York corporation, consignee of a shipment of coffee intended for import, is seeking to compel the defendants, John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, and C. C. Freeman, Acting District Director, Food and Drug Administration, New Orleans, Louisiana, to release for export a portion of the shipment found to be so damaged that it could not be brought into compliance with the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The defendants are withholding the release…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Robert v. Ferry v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Autrice Copeland Freeman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Hammond v. HullCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beaty v. Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. 76,552 Pounds of Frog LegsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
- United States v. Toshoku America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1987
- L & M Industries, Inc. v. George F. Kenter, Food and Drug Hearing Officer, Food and Drug Administration, Brooklyn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- L & M Industries, Inc. v. KenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971