Legal Opinion

Samuel L. Peters, Receiver, and Specialty Envelope, Incorporated, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross United Paperworkers International Union, Local No. 459, United Paperworkers International Union, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Western Paper Products, Incorporated, D/B/A Specialty Envelope Company, United Paperworkers International Union, Local No. 459, United Paperworkers International Union, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1998No. 96-6049PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

153 F.3d 289

158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3037, 135 Lab.Cas. P 10,216

Samuel L. PETERS, Receiver, and Specialty Envelope,

Incorporated, Petitioners/Cross-Respondents,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross Petitioner,

United Paperworkers International Union, Local No. 459,

United Paperworkers International Union, Intervenors.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,

v.

WESTERN PAPER PRODUCTS, Incorporated, d/b/a Specialty

Envelope Company, Respondent,

United Paperworkers International Union, Local No. 459,

United Paperworkers International Union, Intervenors.

Nos. 96-6049, 96-6179 and 96-6184.

United…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Siler; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Findlay Indus., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API