Legal Opinion
Moon v. Moon
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 4, 1944No. Civ. No. 14118PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff: gave notice, January 5, 1943, that she appealed from two orders, one made on December 18,1942, and the other on January 4. In the first of these orders the court modified a provision, in the interlocutory judgment, respecting the custody of Charla, the three-year-old child of the parties, and by the order of January 4 the court *186denied a motion which, if granted, would have restored the provision that the custody of Charla was awarded to the plaintiff.
In the interlocutory judgment which had been entered in this cause on November 17, 1941, this provision was made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Prouty v. ProutyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Washburn v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
- Stack v. StackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Juri v. JuriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Sorrels v. SorrelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cory v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.