Legal Opinion

Nieman v. Jacobs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959No. 6463PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellants sued for damages for personal injuries sustained by Mabel Nieman as a result of the alleged negligence and carelessness of the defendant-appellee in the operation of a passenger elevator located in the Santa Rita Hotel in Tucson, Arizona. The action was tried before a jury and upon the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, on motion of the defendant, the court directed á verdict in favor of the defendant. This appeal follows. Briefly, the facts the jury might have found are these:

The plaintiffs were descending with others from the fifth floor to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Stewart v. Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rodin v. American Can Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Brand v. JH Rose Trucking CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. First National Bank of Arizona v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API