Legal Opinion

Shetter v. Rochelle

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 17, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 95PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment render1 ed in an action by a patient against a doctor for injuries received from an opera1 tion in which a cataract was surgically re-> moved from the right eye of the patient;

The complaint sets up three causes of action. The first count is in negligence, the second count alleges that the defendant-surgeon warranted that the operation would turn out successfully and the third count alleges that the defendant failed to warn the plaintiff of any possible bad results from the operation, and “ * * * that this misconduct was negligent and wrongful…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Ferrara v. GalluchioNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  4. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API