Legal Opinion

Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1660PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

This appeal involves the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in a medical malpractice case brought by the appellant (plaintiff), Margaret Faris, against the appellees (defendants), Charles R. Nevins, M.D., John T. Peter Hayward-Butt, M.D., and Doctors Hospital. The trial court granted each defendant a separate summary judgment, from which the appellant appealed.

Appellant questions the correctness of granting each summary judgment, and contends, in essence, that where she relies on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, in the pretrial stage of the proceedings, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Hunter Contracting Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Lowrey v. Montgomery Kone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API