Legal Opinion

Little v. Phipps

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1911PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a bill for an accounting in respect to various transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant Phipps, whom we will speak of as the defendant. The case was sent to a master.* Upon the coming in of his report both parties filed objections and exceptions thereto. Certain of the plaintiff’s exceptions were sustained and the others were overruled. The defendant’s exceptions were overruled. A decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff, † Both parties appealed from the order overruling their exceptions and from the final decree.

The matters now in issue relate to only two transactions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Quinn v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Wadsworth v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. GaffneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Samia v. Central Oil Co. of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API