Norte & Company v. Huffines
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
Following non-jury trial of this consolidated derivative stockholders’ action in which Defiance Industries, Inc. (“Defiance” herein) was awarded damages in the sum of $3,199,297, plus interest, defendants Muscat and Huffines move for a new trial pursuant to Rules 52, 59 and 60, F.R.Civ.P., or, alternatively, for rehearing on the issue of damages on the ground of newly discovered evidence and that the damages awarded are excessive.
The damages awarded in favor of Defiance against the individual defendants Muscat and’ Huffines, directors of Defiance, resulted from two…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Norte & Co. v. R. L. Huffines, Jr. And Victor Muscat, and L. F. Serrick, Alfred O'gara, Edward Krock and Defiance Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,901 Louis Osofsky v. George C. Zipf, Rose Udoff v. Babcock & Wilcox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Aqua-Culture Technologies, Ltd. v. HollyMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Deborah Tanzer v. Robert H. Huffines, Jr., Edward Krock, Victor Muscat, Defiance Industries, Inc., and B. S. F. Company. B. S. F. CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.