Legal Opinion
Bower v. Weisman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1987No. 85 Civ. 8916 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Frederick R. Weisman (“Weisman”), Frederick Weisman Co. and Rare Properties, Inc. have moved in limine on the eve of trial to preclude the plaintiff, Sachiko Bower (“Bower”), from introducing at trial evidence of (i) certain oral agreements between the parties as barred by the statute of frauds, (ii) future damages, (iii) damages due her daughter, (iv) certain oral agreements modifying written agreements, (v) Weisman’s relationships with other women, (vi) Weisman’s financial condition, (vii) punitive damages, (viii) a lis pendens recorded by Weisman on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Contemporary Mission, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Famous Music Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. ThurlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. SteloffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Marvin Johnson, PC v. ShoenDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995