Legal Opinion

Miller v. Steloff

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 1988No. 87 Civ. 8388 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff David Miller (“Miller”) has moved for summary judgment in his action against Arthur S. Steloff (“Skip”) and Judith L. Steloff (“Judith”) (collectively the “Steloffs”) on a promissory note. 1 The Steloffs oppose the motion and have moved to consolidate this action with one pending before another judge in this district pursuant to Rule 42(a). Fed.R.Civ.P., and for the filing of a formal complaint before this court. For the reasons set forth below, Miller’s motion for summary judgment is granted and the Steloff motions are denied. Prior Procedure

This action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. ThurlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Braten v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Sun Forest Corp. v. ShviliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Aircraft Income Partners II, L.P. (In re Integrated Resources, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Kansallis-Osake-Pankki v. KouriDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API