Legal Opinion

Foster v. Group Health Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 15, 2005PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

We determine in this case the scope of G. L. c. 175, § 1101 (a), which mandates that, in certain circumstances, the insurer of a group health insurance policy continue to provide coverage to the divorced spouse of a group member.2 Prior to his divorce, the plaintiff, James J. Foster, now a resident *669of Massachusetts, was married to Paula Foster,3 an employee of the New York City board of education (New York City) and at all relevant times a resident of New York City. Paula was a member of group health insurance plans offered by New York City, and James received health benefits under those…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Beal v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Hawthorne's, Inc. v. Warrenton Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Roman v. Trustees of Tufts CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Lev v. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. O'Rourke v. HunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. American International Insurance v. Robert Seuffer GmbH & Co. KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Lieberman v. PowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API